Being a three-dimensional object, the earth cannot be
readily represented on a two-dimensional surface like a map. In order to
accomplish this task cartographers have developed projections using complex
mathematical formulas. If you look at the maps above, you will note that each
projection displays a different distance for the route between Washington DC
and Kabul. This is because of differences in the mathematical calculations and
the specific intentions of the cartographer. When working with a map projection
you have to decide which real world features are most important. Is distance
between two designated points most important or do you want that feature more
generalized across the entire map? Cartographers have to take this and similar
questions into account when they make their maps.
Conformal
projections, like the Mercator and Hotine projections above, attempt to preserve
shape locally. These maps are popular but have limited use in doing good
spatial analysis. The Mercator projection for example expands area as one moves
away from the equator. The Hotine projection also displays similar area
distortions.
Equidistant
projections, like the World Azimuthal Equidistant and World Equidistant Conic
projections, have distance calibrated from the center of the map. From this
calibrated center accurate distance is preserved. In the maps above however,
neither Washington DC nor Kabul are at the center so accurate distance remains
distorted.
Equal area projections, like the
Hammer Aitoff and Sinusoidal projections, aim to maintain consistent area.
Compared to the Mercator or Hotine projection these maps represent the amount
of area that each continent takes up on the globe more accurately. In terms of
accuracy for distance these kinds of maps are also skewed.
No comments:
Post a Comment